April 2011
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
« Mar   May »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Month April 2011

Producing the Public: May 9

via DamonRich.net: http://bit.ly/hLDFAn

On Monday, May 9, in my “Understanding Media Studies” lecture class, we’re introducing our “Media and the Urban Environment” curricular focus area by welcoming guest lecturer Damon Rich. The lecture is open to The New School community — but because this is my official class time, I’ll be privileging my own students in the Q&A.

Producing the Public
Damon Rich
Monday, May 9, 6pm
Tishman Auditorium, 66 W 12th Street

Damon Rich is a designer and artist, and currently serves as the Urban Designer for the City of Newark, New Jersey. His work has been exhibited internationally at venues including the 2008 Venice Biennale, Storefront for Art and Architecture and SculptureCenter, the Canadian Centre for Architecture, and the Netherlands Architecture Institute. In Newark, Damon leads design efforts with public and private actors to improve the city’s public spaces, including the launch of the This is Newark! Public Art Program in 2009. Damon is also overseeing the design and development of the city’s first riverfront park, currently in construction. In 1997, he founded the Center for Urban Pedagogy (CUP), a New York City nonprofit organization that uses design to increase the impact of public participation in urban planning and community development, where he was the Creative Director for 10 years. In 2007, he was a Loeb Fellow in Advanced Environmental Studies at the Harvard Graduate School of Design. His solo exhibition Red Lines Housing Crisis Learning Center was on view at the Queens Museum of Art May 31–September 27, 2009.

Some useful resources to review in advance:

Rich's Foreclosure Exhibit @ Queens Museum: via NYT: http://nyti.ms/15PgFf

Sentience and Sedulousness

My review of Sentient City: Ubiquitous Computing, Architecture, and the Future of Urban Space (ed. Mark Shepard, MIT Press 2011) is up on Domus.

Meanwhile, my own sapience is diminishing rapidly. Between 15 hours of committee meetings, six or seven hours of grading, another six or seven hours of thesis review, several hours of course prep, and all the regular teaching-advising-responding-to-email stuff that happens every week, I’m pretty sure I’ve dropped a couple dozen IQ points this week.

How May I Help You?

via Jewish Historical Society of the Upper Midwest on Flickr: http://bit.ly/fsjUvA

My first book was to have been published in 2005. In early 2003, about six months after finishing my dissertation, I signed a contract with Smithsonian Books, and later that spring I won a nice grant from the Graham Foundation that enabled me to travel and complete the book research. I was fortunate to have a postdoctoral fellowship that afforded me sufficient time to finish the manuscript by Spring 2004.

That fall, after I’d reviewed a second set of proofs for the book, the Smithsonian announced that it was reorganizing its press. The result was that most of its academic authors, including me, were released from their contracts. I was, needless to say, devastated — but the Smithsonian’s wonderful executive editor, and my editor, Caroline Newman, effectively became my agent. Within three or four months I had found a new home for the book at the University of Minnesota Press. Even though the manuscript had gone out for external review and passed through rounds of edits and proofs with the Smithsonian, I had to go through it all over again at Minnesota. The book finally came out in Spring 2007 — two years later than initially planned.

I should have another book out by now. That’s what I keep telling myself. The voices of self-criticism have been particularly loud lately, as I look ahead to the August 1 deadline for my tenure dossier. When I scan through the c.v.’s for other junior scholars who are going up for, or who’ve recently gone up for, tenure, I often see a much longer lists of publications…and editorial boards…and keynote addresses.

There are certain areas in which I blow those others out of the water, though. While others might have three or four committees listed under “Service,” I’ve got pages and pages of appointments and chaired committees and other service activities. It’s just too bad that those areas don’t count for much in the tenure review process. Service, sadly, is something that junior scholars aren’t supposed to do.

Yet I’ve done it. A lot of it (Many have commented on the politically sensitive nature of inviting junior faculty to serve on senior-level committees, and on how hard it is to say no). When I organize all those “non-scholarly” activities on my c.v. in chronological order, I get a better sense of what I’ve been doing with my time these past few years. It becomes apparent just how hard it is to get your footing, to establish yourself as a “serious scholar,” when you’re busy serving.

*   *   *   *

What follows are my long-term appointments. I haven’t included any short-term or one-time contributions — or course prep for the 13 new classes I’ve developed over the past seven years, or work involved with handling 30 or 40 advisees and four or five thesis advisees every semester:

2004-2005

  • Graduate Admissions Coordinator: reviewed ~400 admissions folders, organized faculty interviews of candidates, determined scholarship awards, contacted top-ranked candidates
  • Thesis Coordinator and Advisor: developed thesis committee, proposal, and submission policies and created Thesis Handbook; hosted Thesis Information Session each semester and oversaw thesis committee organization; collected and vetted all thesis proposals and completed theses; in 2004-5, served as outside reader on 44 thesis proposals and 20 completed theses

2005-2006

  • Thesis Coordinator and Advisor: hosted Thesis Information Session each semester and oversaw thesis committee organization; collected and vetted all thesis proposals and completed theses
  • Co-Director, Project Media Space | Public Space, with Dr. Elizabeth Ellsworth, Department of Media Studies and Film, The New School
  • Chair, Curriculum and Advising Committee
  • Chair, Admissions Committee
  • Member, Media Research Methods Curriculum Review Committee, 2005
  • Member, History, Theory & Criticism Curriculum Review Committee, 2005

2006-2007

  • Director of Graduate Studies: oversaw curriculum and faculty development for a graduate program with over 500 students and 80+ principal and adjunct faculty; organized, with Executive Secretary’s assistance, each semester’s course schedule, with 60 to 70 classes per semester, and course guide; recruited and trained new part-time faculty and co-organized and oversaw system by which all part-time union faculty are observed and evaluated every year; led all information sessions and recruitment events for prospective and accepted students (8-10 per year); with Department Chair, conducted final review of all prospective student applications (roughly 500 per year), determined final scholarship awards, contacted all top-ranked candidates; developed and coordinated student travel grant program
  • In absence of Student Services Coordinator in Fall 2006: I coordinated all independent studies and 30+ internships; handled all course waivers, registration complications, financial aid queries and appeals, graduation petitions, and international student paperwork; coordinated fall 2006 and spring 2007 registration; and organized Spring 2007 New Student Orientation
  • Thesis Coordinator and Advisor: hosted Thesis Information Session each semester and oversaw thesis committee organization; collected and vetted all thesis proposals and completed theses
  • Chair, Curriculum and Advising Committee
  • Member, Advising Committee
  • Chair, Department Graduate Advising Coordinator Search Committee
  • Member, Department Executive Secretary Search Committee
  • Member, Divisional Appeals Committee
  • Member, Chairs and Directors Group
  • Participant, IDEO Space Planning Research
  • Member, Design and Social Science Curriculum Committee, Provost’s Office
  • Member, Search Committee, Assistant/Associate Professor in Interactive Game Design, Department of Communication Design and Technology, Parsons The New School for Design
  • Member, Search Committee, Department Chair, Department of Media Studies and Film
  • Member, Faculty Development Grant Program Advisory Committee, Provost’s Office

2007-2008

  • Director of Graduate Studies: oversaw curriculum and faculty development for a graduate program with over 500 students and 80+ principal and adjunct faculty; organized, with Executive Secretary’s assistance, each semester’s course schedule, with 60 to 70 classes per semester, and course guide; collaborated on major revision of methodology curricula: developed new, specialized variable-credit methods courses; developed Media and Urban Environments area of study, and co-developed, with Barry Salmon, Sound Studies area of study; recruited and trained new part-time faculty and co-organized and oversaw system by which all part-time union faculty are observed and evaluated every year; represented program at all University Teaching Assistant recruitment events; reviewed TA applications; interviewed candidates; selected and trained TA’s; led all information sessions and recruitment events for prospective and accepted students (8-10 per year); with Department Chair, conducted final review of all prospective student applications (roughly 500 per year), determined final scholarship awards, contacted all top-ranked candidates
  • Thesis Coordinator and Advisor: hosted Thesis Information Session each semester and oversaw thesis committee organization; collected and vetted all thesis proposals and completed theses
  • Chair, Curriculum and Advising Committee
  • Member, Strategic Planning Committee
  • Member, Chairs and Directors Group
  • Member, Executive Committee
  • Juror, Interdisciplinary Memory Conference Exhibition
  • Member, Media Curricular Committee, Provost’s Office
  • Member, WNSR Radio Advisory Board
  • Member, Search Committee, Department Chair, Department of Media Studies and Film
  • Member, Faculty Development Grant Program Advisory Committee, Provost’s Office

2008-2009

  • Director of Graduate Studies: oversaw curriculum and faculty development for a graduate program with over 500 students and 80+ principal and adjunct faculty; organized, with Executive Secretary’s assistance, each semester’s course schedule, with 60 to 70 classes per semester, and course guide; taught first iteration of new required, introductory graduate lecture course, which involved the recording of weekly lectures and oversight of discussion sections; recruited and trained new part-time faculty and co-organized and oversaw system by which all part-time union faculty are observed and evaluated every year; represented program at all University Teaching Assistant recruitment events; reviewed TA applications; interviewed candidates; selected and trained TA’s; led all information sessions and recruitment events for prospective and accepted students (8-10 per year); with Department Chair, conducted final review of all prospective student applications (roughly 500 per year), determined final scholarship awards, contacted all top-ranked candidates; developed content for online Orientation site and much content for revised department website
  • Chair, Required Courses Committee
  • Member, Chairs and Directors Group
  • Member, Executive Committee
  • Member, Assistant Professor in International Affairs and Media Search Committee
  • Member, Search Committee, Deans of Parsons’ College of Art, Media & Technology
  • Member, Faculty Development Grant Program Advisory Committee, Provost’s Office
  • Co-Organizer, Catastrophe Slam, with Dr. Robert Kirkbride (Project Director); Cross-divisional New School design project

2009-2010

  • Member, “Mission/Vision” Committee for Merger of New School for General Studies and Milano The New School for Urban Policy
  • Member, New School Provost’s Office’s Applied Think Tank
  • Invited Participant, Online Learning Charrette, Provost’s Office
  • Member, Search Committee, Dean, Online Learning

2010-2011

  • Member, Assistant Professor in Media Pedagogy Search Committee
  • Member, Senior Civic Engagement Faculty Search Committee
  • Chair, Ph.D. Program Proposal Committee
  • Member, Program Self-Study Committee
  • Member, Space Planning Committee
  • Member, Fellowship Jury, Vera List Center for Art and Politics
  • Member, Innovations in Education Fund Review Committee, Provost’s Office
  • Member, Undergraduate Media Studies Committee, Provost’s Office

Just reading that list exhausts me.

 

PhDs for Polymaths

Gregor Aisch's visualization of plagiarized passages in German defense minister Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg's dissertation: http://bit.ly/i11dAG

Over the past couple years I’ve taught a few graduate classes that incorporate ideas from the Digital Humanities and emphasize “multimodal scholarship,” and I’ve been conducting research on praxis-based PhD programs. It’s for these reasons, I assume, that the planning committee for our graduate students’ Critical Themes in Media Studies conference asked me earlier this year to organize an opening-night panel on multimodal doctoral work and praxis-based PhDs. So, for the past couple months I’ve contacted graduate directors and colleagues at various local institutions to ask if any of their students are completing non-traditional (i.e., not solely text-based) dissertations on media studies-related topics. Their recommendations have helped me to pull together an impressive panel of three inspired young artist-scholars. Next Friday evening, April 15, at 5:30pm, before Clay Shirky’s opening keynote, we’ll be gathering in the Teresa Lang Center, on the 2nd floor at 55 W 13th Street, to talk about “The Multimodal Dissertation.” Come join us.

Multimodal scholarship, writes USC’s Tara McPherson (2009), deploys “new experiential, emotional, and even tactile aspects of argument and expression” in order to “open up fresh avenues of inquiry and research.” How might we in Media Studies transform the media technologies that have traditionally been our research subjects, into research tools, and thereby “open up fresh avenues” of creative scholarship? This panel examines how these new modes of scholarly practice are informing doctoral education. Our three panelists discuss how they’re infusing media-making into their dissertations, and how they’re navigating the still largely uncharted terrain of multimodal scholarship.

The Sound of America: Sound, Sensation, Sentiment, and Knowledge in American West Tourism

Presenter: Jennifer Heuson

Links between the American West and American identity, memory, and history are well documented. America constructs its uniqueness through the land and people west of the Mississippi. American West tourism is a crucial form of this construction.

Traveling west has become a ritual of citizenship, a pilgrimage to the birthplace of a mythical America. This is the America of cowboys and Indians, of gold mines and train robberies, of wild horses and still wilder people. It is an America of the past, performed in the present, informing the future. While scholars have devoted much energy to unpacking the significance of Wild West mythologies, two important areas remain underdeveloped: tourism and sound. My work engages both as key to the production and circulation of the “Wild” American West and its meanings. Tourist experiences of the American West play a pivotal role in knowledge of American history and identity. Yet, such experiences are neither natural, nor benign. They are mediated, historical, and political. They are actual and imagined. They are also sensual. It is the power of the sensual, living tourist encounter I hope to uncover by engaging its sonic contours. The sound of the American West, as a national soundscape, reveals much about how America is known, remembered, and imagined. It also hints at the future forms of American politics, at home and abroad.

Marquee Survivals: Racialized Urbanism in Cinema’s Recycled Spaces

Presenter: Veronica Paredes

Marquee Survivals is an interactive, digital dissertation that explores contemporary conceptions of the repurposed movie theater. Across the United States, twentieth-century movie theaters have been converted into a variety of different establishments, including churches, swap meets, clothing and electronics stores. This project unravels how discussions surrounding these former movie houses racialize the spatial and historical perceptions of American popular media. In unpacking nostalgia’s place in touring the extant structures of film exhibition, Marquee Survivals highlights the roles race, ethnicity, and nation play in constructing the cultural narrative of cinema’s decline in the American downtown.

Incorporating methodologies from diverse academic disciplines, Marquee Survivals is also a networked digital dissertation that complicates dominant understandings of cinema’s early exhibition spaces by connecting them to present-day media consumption. Working toward an alternative media historiography of the repurposed movie theater, Marquee Survivals marries film theory and history, cultural studies, and digital media production. This presentation will feature documentation of Marquee Survival’s design processes and struggles. What are the challenges of building a distributed dissertation project that has equal investment in achieving rigorous scholarship and an affective user experience?

Hitting Walls (v.XVII): Some Strategies, Several Projections

Presenter: Carlin Wing

Hitting Walls uses the sport of squash to address colonial histories, globalization and the potential for serious play within overdetermined structures. The project exists as a series of iterations made in a variety of media including large format photography, appropriated webgrabs, video, sculpture, performance, participatory activities and academic lectures. The most recent completed iteration took the form of a lecture and workshop on ball-making methods at Machine Project in Los Angeles this past January.

I expect my dissertation to exist as one more iterative element of this larger project. My broad goal is to use my dissertation as an opportunity to experiment with and make a claim for hybrid formats of intellectual work. As this is my first year in a doctoral program, it does not seem particularly helpful to pretend that I already know what form my dissertation will take. I cannot even, at this stage, claim with absolute confidence that it will make sense to me four years from now to consider the project to be part of Hitting Walls. I do expect a large amount of the work to be written but I also intend for there to be play within that writing, as well as essential elements, visual, aural or otherwise, which will work with the written components.

I would like to take the opportunity of this panel to briefly share a few of the Hitting Walls projects and to discuss various ways to experiment with academic, as well as other, forms. I would then like to open up a conversation that I am just beginning to have within my own department about how a dissertation is, can and should be defined. Right now it seems like a matter of shaping some good questions, setting them loose, and seeing how they ricochet.

Supplementary materials: carlinwing.net